Steel Base Plate Design Example -- AISC LRFD Worked Problem

This page presents a fully worked base plate design problem following AISC 360-22 LRFD provisions and AISC Design Guide 1. Every calculation step is shown explicitly. This is a pure worked example. For the underlying theory, bearing equations, and code comparison tables, refer to the Base Plate Design Reference. For column-specific considerations and stiffened base plates, see the Column Base Plate Reference.

Problem Statement

Design a base plate for an interior W12x96 column in a 6-story office building. The column supports 4 floors of composite steel framing plus roof. The foundation is a 32 in. x 32 in. reinforced concrete pier. Dead load is from composite slab (3-1/4 in. lightweight concrete on 3 in. metal deck, 20 ga), steel framing, MEP, ceiling, and partitions. Live load is office occupancy with a live load reduction per ASCE 7-22 Section 4.7.2.

Given Data

Parameter Value Source
Column W12x96, ASTM A992 d = 12.7 in., bf = 12.2 in., tw = 0.550 in., tf = 0.900 in., k = 1.27 in.
Pu (LRFD) 540 kip From frame analysis, load combo 1.2D + 1.6L
Vu (LRFD) 18 kip From frame analysis
Mu (LRFD) 0 kip-in Interior gravity column, negligible moment
f'c 5,000 psi Normal weight concrete
Pier 32 x 32 in. Below SOG, isolated footing
Plate Fy 36 ksi ASTM A36 plate
Anchor rods ASTM F1554 Gr 36 Threaded rods with heavy hex nuts
Grout Non-shrink, f'c_grout = 6,000 psi Prepackaged cementitious

Step 1: Determine Trial Plate Dimensions

Minimum bearing area from concrete strength:

Try a square plate. The minimum area A1 (assuming A2/A1 cap of 2.0):

A1_min = Pu / (phi_c x 0.85 x f'c x 2.0) A1_min = 540 / (0.65 x 0.85 x 5 x 2.0) A1_min = 540 / (0.65 x 8.5) A1_min = 540 / 5.525 A1_min = 97.7 in^2

This is the absolute minimum. For a square plate, side = sqrt(97.7) = 9.9 in. But this would not extend beyond the column footprint (bf = 12.2 in., d = 12.7 in.). The plate must project beyond the column for anchor rods and weld access.

Practical minimum dimensions:

B = bf + 2 x (2 in. min projection) = 12.2 + 4 = 16.2 in. Use B = 18 in. N = d + 2 x (2 in. min projection) = 12.7 + 4 = 16.7 in. Use N = 18 in.

Trial: B = 18 in., N = 18 in. Square plate.

A1 = 18 x 18 = 324 in^2.

Step 2: Check Concrete Bearing Capacity

Calculate A2:

The pier is 32 x 32 in. The projected area A2 is geometrically similar to A1 and concentric with it. The maximum A2 is the pier area = 32 x 32 = 1,024 in^2. For this geometry:

A2/A1 = 1,024 / 324 = 3.16

But the A2/A1 ratio is capped at 4.0 in the sqrt term, capped at 2.0 for the enhancement factor per ACI 318-19 Section 22.8.3. sqrt(A2/A1) = min(sqrt(3.16), 2.0) = min(1.778, 2.0) = 1.778.

Design bearing strength:

phi Pp = phi_c x 0.85 x f'c x A1 x sqrt(A2/A1) phi Pp = 0.65 x 0.85 x 5 x 324 x 1.778 phi Pp = 0.65 x 0.85 x 5 x 324 x 1.778 phi Pp = 0.65 x 2,448 phi Pp = 1,591 kip

Check: Pu = 540 kip < phi Pp = 1,591 kip. OK.

Bearing utilization: 540 / 1,591 = 0.34. Bearing is not the controlling limit state. The plate thickness will control.

Step 3: Compute Bearing Pressure

Under concentric axial load, the bearing pressure is uniform:

fp = Pu / A1 = 540 / 324 = 1.667 ksi

This is well below the grout compressive strength (6 ksi) and concrete bearing strength (0.85 x f'c x sqrt(A2/A1) = 0.85 x 5 x 1.778 = 7.56 ksi).

Step 4: Compute Cantilever Dimensions

The base plate is modeled as a cantilever projecting beyond the column bearing footprint. The three cantilever dimensions per AISC DG1 are:

m -- projection beyond column depth (parallel to web):

The column depth d = 12.7 in. The effective bearing depth is 0.95d = 0.95 x 12.7 = 12.07 in.

m = (N - 0.95 d) / 2 = (18 - 12.07) / 2 = 5.93 / 2 = 2.965 in.

n -- projection beyond column flange width:

bf = 12.2 in. The effective bearing width is 0.80 bf = 0.80 x 12.2 = 9.76 in.

n = (B - 0.80 bf) / 2 = (18 - 9.76) / 2 = 8.24 / 2 = 4.12 in.

lambda-n' -- effective projection for area inside flanges (Thornton model):

For W-shapes with bf/d >= 0.5, the parameter lambda = 1.0. Here bf/d = 12.2/12.7 = 0.961 > 0.5, so lambda = 1.0.

n' = sqrt(d x bf) / 4 = sqrt(12.7 x 12.2) / 4 = sqrt(154.9) / 4 = 12.45 / 4 = 3.112 in.

lambda x n' = 1.0 x 3.112 = 3.112 in.

Controlling cantilever dimension:

l = max(m, n, lambda-n') = max(2.965, 4.12, 3.112) = 4.12 in. (n governs)

This is consistent with the W12x96 section having a flange width slightly less than the depth -- the cantilever parallel to the flange (n) controls.

Step 5: Calculate Required Plate Thickness

The required thickness for the cantilever bending model:

tp_req = l x sqrt(2 x fp / (phi_b x Fy))

where:

tp_req = 4.12 x sqrt(2 x 1.667 / (0.90 x 36)) tp_req = 4.12 x sqrt(3.334 / 32.40) tp_req = 4.12 x sqrt(0.10290) tp_req = 4.12 x 0.3207 tp_req = 1.32 in.

Select plate thickness: Use tp = 1-3/8 in. (1.375 in.). This is the next standard thickness increment above the required value.

Check with selected thickness:

phi Mn = 0.90 x Fy x (1 in. strip width) x tp^2 / 4 = 0.90 x 36 x 1 x 1.375^2 / 4 = 0.90 x 36 x 1.891 / 4 = 15.32 kip-in per inch width

Mu = fp x l^2 / 2 = 1.667 x 4.12^2 / 2 = 1.667 x 16.97 / 2 = 14.14 kip-in per inch width

phi Mn = 15.32 > Mu = 14.14. OK.

Step 6: Select Anchor Rods

For an interior gravity column with negligible moment and low shear, four anchor rods in a standard pattern are sufficient.

Rod diameter: Minimum practical rod = 3/4 in. diameter. The rod must engage enough concrete to develop the full steel tensile strength per ACI 318 Chapter 17. Use 4 x 7/8 in. diameter F1554 Gr 36 anchor rods.

Rod layout: Place rods at 14 in. x 14 in. square pattern (centered on the plate). Edge distance = (18 - 14) / 2 + 0.875/2 = 2.0 + 0.44 = 2.44 in. This exceeds the minimum edge distance of 6d = 6 x 0.875 = 5.25 in. ... wait, re-check.

Minimum edge distance for headed anchors per ACI 318 Table 17.9.2 is 6d for a headed anchor not limited by torque-controlled installation. For 7/8 in. rod: 6 x 0.875 = 5.25 in. Our edge distance of 2.44 in. is LESS than 5.25 in. This means we cannot develop full concrete breakout capacity.

Revised rod layout: Place rods at 10 in. x 10 in. square pattern. Edge distance = (18 - 10) / 2 = 4.0 in. center-to-edge. Still less than 5.25 in. The anchor group will have reduced breakout capacity.

Concrete breakout check (tension, single anchor):

hef = 8 in. (specified embedment for 7/8 in. rod).

For a single anchor influenced by edge distance:

ca1 = 4.0 in. (edge distance to plate edge; the pier edge is at (32-18)/2 + 4 = 11 in., so pier edge does not control).

ACI 318 Section 17.4.2.3, modification factor for edge distance:

phi_ed,N = 0.7 + 0.3 x (ca1 / 1.5 hef) = 0.7 + 0.3 x (4.0 / 12.0) = 0.7 + 0.3 x 0.333 = 0.80

Steel strength controls per rod: phi Nsa = 0.75 x 0.462 x 58 = 20.1 kip (tensile stress area Ase = 0.462 in^2 for 7/8 in. rod).

Since the column is in compression (no uplift), the anchor rods resist only nominal forces from erection and accidental eccentricity. The reduced concrete breakout capacity is acceptable.

Final rod specification: 4 x 7/8 in. diameter ASTM F1554 Gr 36 anchor rods, 8 in. minimum embedment, with 2-1/2 in. x 2-1/2 in. x 3/8 in. plate washers. Provide 2 in. projection above plate for nut and washer stack.

Step 7: Check Shear Transfer

Vu = 18 kip.

Friction capacity: mu x Pu = 0.55 x 540 = 297 kip >> 18 kip.

Friction alone provides ample shear resistance. No shear lug required. The anchor rods carry zero shear in the final condition.

Note on construction shear: During erection, before the grout sets and before gravity load is fully engaged, friction is not available. The anchor rods must resist erection shear. For 4 rods in shear: phi Vsa = 4 x 0.75 x 0.60 x 0.462 x 58 = 4 x 12.1 = 48.4 kip > 18 kip. OK.

Step 8: Weld Design (Column to Base Plate)

The column is shop-welded to the base plate. Use fillet welds all around the column profile.

Flange weld: The flange force is Pu x (Af / Ag). For W12x96, Af = bf x tf = 12.2 x 0.900 = 10.98 in^2 per flange. Ag = 28.2 in^2. Flange force = 540 x (10.98 / 28.2) = 210 kip per flange.

Weld length per flange (both sides) = 2 x 12.2 = 24.4 in. Required weld strength = 210 / 24.4 = 8.61 kip/in. For E70XX electrodes (0.60 x 70 = 42 ksi weld metal), minimum fillet size per Table J2.4 for 0.900 in. flange = 5/16 in. Capacity of 5/16 in. fillet: phi Rn = 0.75 x 0.60 x 70 x (5/16 x 0.707) = 0.75 x 42 x 0.221 = 6.96 kip/in < 8.61 kip/in. Insufficient.

Increase to 3/8 in. fillet: phi Rn = 0.75 x 0.60 x 70 x (3/8 x 0.707) = 0.75 x 42 x 0.265 = 8.35 kip/in < 8.61 kip/in. Still slightly insufficient.

Use 7/16 in. fillet weld at flanges: phi Rn = 0.75 x 0.60 x 70 x (7/16 x 0.707) = 0.75 x 42 x 0.309 = 9.74 kip/in > 8.61 kip/in. OK.

Web weld: Web force = Pu x (Aw / Ag) = 540 x ((12.7 - 2 x 0.900) x 0.550 / 28.2) = 540 x (10.90 x 0.550 / 28.2) = 540 x 0.213 = 115 kip. Weld length (both sides of web) = 2 x (12.7 - 2 x 1.27) = 2 x 10.16 = 20.32 in. Required strength = 115 / 20.32 = 5.66 kip/in. Minimum 5/16 in. fillet capacity = 6.96 kip/in > 5.66 kip/in. OK to use 5/16 in. fillet at the web.

Summary of Design

Item Specification
Base plate PL 1-3/8 x 18 x 18, ASTM A36
Anchor rods 4 x 7/8 in. dia. ASTM F1554 Gr 36, 8 in. embed
Rod pattern 10 in. x 10 in. square, centered on plate
Plate washers 2-1/2 x 2-1/2 x 3/8 in., ASTM F436
Grout Non-shrink cementitious, f'c = 6,000 psi min., 1 in. thickness
Weld (flanges) 7/16 in. fillet weld, E70XX, both sides
Weld (web) 5/16 in. fillet weld, E70XX, both sides
Hole diameter 1-3/16 in. (1/16 over nut clearance, standard)

Design Verification

Independent check points an experienced engineer would verify:

  1. Bearing: fp = 1.67 ksi << 0.85 f'c sqrt(A2/A1) = 7.56 ksi. OK.
  2. Plate bending: tp_provided = 1.375 in. > tp_req = 1.32 in. OK.
  3. Rod edge distance: Edge distance reduces concrete breakout but is acceptable for compression-only case.
  4. Weld shear at flange: 9.74 kip/in capacity > 8.61 kip/in demand. OK.
  5. Friction shear: 297 kip >> 18 kip. OK.

Related Tools and References

Disclaimer

This page is for educational and reference use only. This worked example illustrates a typical design approach but does not replace project-specific engineering analysis. All designs must be verified by a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) or Structural Engineer (SE) for the specific project conditions, loads, and governing building code. The site operator disclaims liability for any loss arising from the use of this information. Results are PRELIMINARY -- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.