Australian Steel Charpy V-Notch Impact Values — AS/NZS 3679.1
Quick access: [[Australian Steel Grades|/reference/australian-steel-grades/]] | [[Australian Steel Properties|/reference/australian-steel-properties/]] | [[Australian Beam Sizes|/reference/au-beam-sizes/]] | [[Australian Bolt Capacity|/reference/australian-bolt-capacity/]] | [[AS 4100 Beam Design|/reference/as4100-beam-design-example/]] | [[All Australian References|/reference/]]
Reference for Charpy V-notch (CVN) impact testing per AS/NZS 3679.1:2016 and AS 4100:2020 Clause 2.4.5. Covers L0 and L15 designations, minimum absorbed energy, test temperatures.
| Designation | Temp | Min Avg | Min Single | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0 | 0°C | 27 J | 20 J | Standard coastal/urban |
| L15 | -15°C | 27 J | 20 J | Alpine, fracture-critical |
| L20 | -20°C | 27 J | 20 J | Special low-temp |
Required Charpy by Application
| Application | Min Designation | Clause |
|---|---|---|
| Building columns (compression) | None required | 2.4.5.1 |
| Tension members (ext <0°C) | L15 | 2.4.5.2 |
| Fracture-critical (bridges) | L15 | 2.4.5.3 |
| Seismic ductile members | L0 | AS 1170.4 |
Worked Example
Problem: Welded tension member, Jindabyne NSW (min -8°C). Grade 350 plate, 25 mm.
Solution: Per Clause 2.4.5.2: ambient <0°C → L15. Specify Grade 350 L15 (27 J at -15°C). One set of 3 specimens per heat.
Design Resources
- [[Australian Steel Grades|/reference/australian-steel-grades/]] | [[Australian Steel Properties|/reference/australian-steel-properties/]] | [[Australian Beam Sizes|/reference/au-beam-sizes/]] | [[Australian Bolt Capacity|/reference/australian-bolt-capacity/]] | [[AS 4100 Beam Design|/reference/as4100-beam-design-example/]] | [[All Australian References|/reference/]]
FAQ
What is the standard Charpy requirement for Grade 300 steel? L0: min 27 J at 0°C. Grade 300PLUS guarantees 27 J at 0°C for all thicknesses.
When should L15 be specified? Alpine regions, dynamically loaded structures, and tensile stress below -5°C ambient.
What if a Charpy test fails? Retest 3 additional specimens. Failure on retest rejects material per AS/NZS 3679.1 Clause 8.4.
Educational Use Only — This reference is for educational and preliminary design purposes only. All structural designs must be independently verified by a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) or Structural Engineer (SE) in accordance with AS 4100:2020 and all applicable Australian Standards. Results are not for construction.
Design Applications
Common Design Scenarios
This reference covers structural design scenarios commonly encountered in Australian steel design practice:
- Strength verification: Check member or connection capacity against factored loads per the applicable design code
- Serviceability checks: Verify deflections, vibrations, and other serviceability criteria
- Code compliance: Ensure design meets all provisions of the governing standard
- Connection detailing: Verify weld sizes, bolt quantities, and edge distances
Related Design Considerations
- System behavior: consider the interaction between members and connections
- Load paths: verify that forces can be transferred through the structure to the foundations
- Constructability: check that the design can be fabricated and erected practically
- Cost optimization: evaluate alternative sections or connection types for economy
Worked Example
Problem: Verify a Grade 300 member for the following conditions:
Typical span: 6.0 m | Load: service loads per applicable code | Section: common section in this category
Design Check:
- Determine governing load combination (LRFD or ASD per applicable code)
- Calculate maximum internal forces (moment, shear, axial)
- Compute nominal capacity per code provisions
- Apply resistance/safety factors
- Verify interaction if combined forces exist
Result: Use the results from the Steel Calculator tool to verify design adequacy.
Charpy Impact Testing Requirements per AS 4100
AS 4100 Clause 2.4 specifies Charpy V-notch (CVN) impact testing requirements for fracture-critical steel elements. The minimum absorbed energy depends on the service temperature and stress category:
| Stress Category | Minimum CVN @ Service Temp | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Tension (Category 1) | 27 J | Primary tension members, splices |
| Tension (Category 2) | 20 J | Secondary tension members |
| Compression | 14 J | Columns, compression flanges |
| Connection elements | 27 J | Gusset plates, connection plates |
Testing Temperature Requirements
The Charpy test temperature must be at or below the minimum service temperature. For Australian conditions:
- Standard (interior): 0°C test temperature
- Moderate (coastal): −10°C test temperature
- Severe (mountain/southern): −20°C test temperature or lower
Steel Grade CVN Performance
Typical Charpy values for common Australian grades:
- Grade 300: Typically 27 J at 0°C (standard), satisfies Category 1 for most interior applications
- Grade 350: 27-40 J at 0°C, better notch toughness than Grade 300
- Grade 400: 40-60 J at 0°C, suitable for low-temperature applications
- Grade 450: 60+ J at 0°C— recommended for fracture-critical members in severe environments
Frequently Asked Questions
What Australian Standard governs structural steel design?
AS 4100-2020 (Steel Structures) is the primary standard for structural steel design in Australia. It covers all aspects of design including member capacity, connections, serviceability, and fire resistance. The standard uses a limit states design philosophy with resistance factors (φ) applied to nominal capacities. Companion standards include AS/NZS 3679.1 for hot-rolled sections, AS/NZS 1554 for welding, and AS/NZS 4600 for cold-formed steel.
What are the common steel grades used in Australian construction?
The most common steel grades for Australian construction are Grade 300 and Grade 350 per AS/NZS 3679.1. Grade 300 (minimum yield 300 MPa for sections > 12 mm thick) is the standard for general structural applications. Grade 350 (minimum yield 340 MPa for sections > 12 mm) is used where higher strength reduces weight. Grade 400 and Grade 450 are available for specialized applications requiring higher strength-to-weight ratios.
How does AS 4100 compare to AISC 360?
Both AS 4100 and AISC 360 use limit states design (LRFD) principles. Key differences include: AS 4100 uses a single "capacity factor" φ approach rather than separate φ for different failure modes; AS 4100 specifies distinct buckling curves for hot-rolled and welded sections; the moment capacity formula in AS 4100 uses αm factor directly rather than Cb; and AS 4100 has more detailed provisions for slender sections and combined actions. Despite philosophical differences, both codes produce similar results for typical members.